<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Firefox 3 Lazy Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 02:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: allbluedream</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-151685</link>
		<dc:creator>allbluedream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-151685</guid>
		<description>Quote:
&#039;Compiz has workaroundsâ€¦&#039;

It seems that the workaround does not work (in the way I expect it to).
It doesn&#039;t matter if the FF workaround checkbox is checked or not, menus in FF always behave like windows with regard to animation--and that looks funny and annoying.

As a side note, is this window-like behavior introduced in beta 5? I never noticed this issue before that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:<br />
&#8216;Compiz has workaroundsâ€¦&#8217;</p>
<p>It seems that the workaround does not work (in the way I expect it to).<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter if the FF workaround checkbox is checked or not, menus in FF always behave like windows with regard to animation&#8211;and that looks funny and annoying.</p>
<p>As a side note, is this window-like behavior introduced in beta 5? I never noticed this issue before that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livio</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-140296</link>
		<dc:creator>Livio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-140296</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve filled a bug about window hints in Firefox.
If it would get fixed, we&#039;ll be happy :) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve filled a bug about window hints in Firefox.<br />
If it would get fixed, we&#8217;ll be happy <img src='http://abock.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert O'Callahan</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-132750</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert O'Callahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-132750</guid>
		<description>AsbjÃ¸rn: Firefox acts much more like Opera than IE7 when zooming. When you zoom in, we reflow the content to the narrower window width.

I&#039;m not sure which pages Aaron is seeing horizontal scrollbars on, but it&#039;s probably some page that lays out to a fixed px width. A genuine fluid CSS layout should have no problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AsbjÃ¸rn: Firefox acts much more like Opera than IE7 when zooming. When you zoom in, we reflow the content to the narrower window width.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure which pages Aaron is seeing horizontal scrollbars on, but it&#8217;s probably some page that lays out to a fixed px width. A genuine fluid CSS layout should have no problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livio</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-129412</link>
		<dc:creator>Livio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-129412</guid>
		<description>[[ *Menus donâ€™t act as menus. IANAH but Iâ€™m guessing Firefox doesnâ€™t give them the right GTK class. Try using Compiz - theyâ€™ll act as windows most of the time. ]]

Compiz has workarounds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[[ *Menus donâ€™t act as menus. IANAH but Iâ€™m guessing Firefox doesnâ€™t give them the right GTK class. Try using Compiz - theyâ€™ll act as windows most of the time. ]]</p>
<p>Compiz has workarounds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-127941</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-127941</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;*Menus donâ€™t act as menus. IANAH but Iâ€™m guessing Firefox doesnâ€™t give them the right GTK class. Try using Compiz - theyâ€™ll act as windows most of the time.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am not a programmer, but is it even possible to give FF menus a GTK class? They are implemented in XUL, and I don&#039;t know if it is possible to map across to GTK like that.

I can&#039;t understand why anyone would dislike the awesomebar. I think it is one of the greatest browser features I have ever seen. Now if only it would hurry up and get to SeaMonkey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>*Menus donâ€™t act as menus. IANAH but Iâ€™m guessing Firefox doesnâ€™t give them the right GTK class. Try using Compiz &#8211; theyâ€™ll act as windows most of the time.</p></blockquote>
<p>I am not a programmer, but is it even possible to give FF menus a GTK class? They are implemented in XUL, and I don&#8217;t know if it is possible to map across to GTK like that.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t understand why anyone would dislike the awesomebar. I think it is one of the greatest browser features I have ever seen. Now if only it would hurry up and get to SeaMonkey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mm</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-127873</link>
		<dc:creator>Mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-127873</guid>
		<description>You missed that ... it compiles with GCC 4.3!

Overall I&#039;m very pleased with the progress so far, though I&#039;m using Gentoo&#039;s mozilla overlay so I&#039;m not rebuilding it every day.

Three things that I&#039;m disappointed with from the top of my head:
*The tab bar. Yes, it&#039;s nice and integrated now, but mouse behaviour doesn&#039;t match Gnome&#039;s. The scroll button doesn&#039;t switch tabs, it triggers this horridly slow animation.
*Menu icons. I have icons disabled for Gnome. Firefox should follow suit. I find icons in menus incredibly distracting and very tacky. That being said, if menu icons are used in Gnome, Firefox should do the same; and
*Menus don&#039;t act as menus. IANAH but I&#039;m guessing Firefox doesn&#039;t give them the right GTK class. Try using Compiz - they&#039;ll act as windows most of the time.

But it is a /very/ much an improvement over 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed that &#8230; it compiles with GCC 4.3!</p>
<p>Overall I&#8217;m very pleased with the progress so far, though I&#8217;m using Gentoo&#8217;s mozilla overlay so I&#8217;m not rebuilding it every day.</p>
<p>Three things that I&#8217;m disappointed with from the top of my head:<br />
*The tab bar. Yes, it&#8217;s nice and integrated now, but mouse behaviour doesn&#8217;t match Gnome&#8217;s. The scroll button doesn&#8217;t switch tabs, it triggers this horridly slow animation.<br />
*Menu icons. I have icons disabled for Gnome. Firefox should follow suit. I find icons in menus incredibly distracting and very tacky. That being said, if menu icons are used in Gnome, Firefox should do the same; and<br />
*Menus don&#8217;t act as menus. IANAH but I&#8217;m guessing Firefox doesn&#8217;t give them the right GTK class. Try using Compiz &#8211; they&#8217;ll act as windows most of the time.</p>
<p>But it is a /very/ much an improvement over 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Willis</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-127868</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-127868</guid>
		<description>@Kalle:  Try setting browser.urlbar.richResults to false in about:config to get rid of all that crap :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kalle:  Try setting browser.urlbar.richResults to false in about:config to get rid of all that crap <img src='http://abock.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Conkling</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-127867</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Conkling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-127867</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are subtle attempts of humor.&quot;
Could you describe? I hadn&#039;t come across these yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are subtle attempts of humor.&#8221;<br />
Could you describe? I hadn&#8217;t come across these yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tack</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-127865</link>
		<dc:creator>Tack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-127865</guid>
		<description>Use &lt;a href=&quot;http://urandom.ca/nosquint/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NoSquint&lt;/a&gt; when I get around to porting it to ff 3.  It will do exactly what you want. :)

(Sorry I can&#039;t offer any advice that will work immediately.  But do keep your eye on NoSquint.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use <a href="http://urandom.ca/nosquint/" rel="nofollow">NoSquint</a> when I get around to porting it to ff 3.  It will do exactly what you want. <img src='http://abock.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(Sorry I can&#8217;t offer any advice that will work immediately.  But do keep your eye on NoSquint.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/comment-page-1#comment-127840</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abock.org/2008/01/15/dear-firefox-3-lazy-web/#comment-127840</guid>
		<description>Gah, I didn&#039;t know that they had sacrificed my precious text zooming at the altar of full-page zoom.  There will be blood tonight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah, I didn&#8217;t know that they had sacrificed my precious text zooming at the altar of full-page zoom.  There will be blood tonight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
